This is an issue that bothers me a lot. The cries from people to stop zoos and release the animals seems to be increasing and public outcry about the captive conditions of some animals seems to be forcing zoos to reconsider their policies. I should point out that this is only dealing with zoos as marine parks, such as SeaWorld will be covered another time.
Zoos have positive and negative aspects but I am not
going to lie when I say I support some of the zoos out there. Don't get me
wrong, I believe that animals should be born free and live free but zoos do
have some benefit Firstly zoos can offer stock for genetic variation and can
take part in vital conservation work as with the Mexican wolf, the Sumatran and
south china tiger as well as the pandas. Several conservation efforts are in
part funded through zoos and some of these efforts may have not even started if
it wasn't for zoos as public are more likely to donate money when they have
seen an animal close up.
What is more, zoos have what I like to call an
"exposure effect". People get to see animals up close and in person.
Although people will argue that you can see animals in documentaries and online
I can guarantee to you that it's a lot different to see animals up close. It
usually makes little difference in adults but any difference counts. Even if
one of those adults decides to look up tiger conservation, Scottish wildcat
conservation and so forth and donate money or time towards a species conservation,
then that is a small victory for conservationists everywhere. However in my
opinion children are the group which benefits most about zoos. Sure zoos might
at points give misinformation and sure children may get upset if animal living
conditions are poor, but children are the ones who are more influenced by zoos
rather than anyone else. A lot of the people I tend to talk to in my degree and
other wildlife related degrees all agree that they do it because they love the
animals and the environment. Not all of us however were lucky enough to have an
animal experience which actually took place in the wild. For me the first wild
animal experience that I remember wasn't
until I was ten years old and saw humpbacks of the East coast of the United
States. Until then I was content with the zoo we had in Cyprus(which featured
animals in horrible conditions), the rare wild animals of Cyprus and the
museums. It was only through documentaries and the zoo that I grew up to love
animals. As most children are fascinated by animals in the first place, a visit
to the zoo only enhances that fascination. If from a school trip, three or four
children end up being fascinated with animals and support a cause then again
some small victories are gained.
On the negative side, the demand to see these animals
causes animal captures, captive breeding where it may not be necessary and in
the end some animals ending up in poor conditions. Not all zoos have proper
living conditions for their animals and even so some animals may not be
suitable for captive conditions and just die. A lot of animals die every year
because of poorly managed zoos, bad living conditions, transportations, vet
operations and so forth and this is a sad truth. Although a lot of zoos are beginning to clean
up their acts, provide better habitats for the animals and started aiding
conservation efforts there is still a long way to go.
In my opinion zoos are a necessary evil. There may be
a time when traveling is cheap and easy and the chance to see a wild lion is
only a weekend and a few dollars but for now with travelling still being expensive
for some, animals being elusive and rare in the wild, and the demand to see
animals up close then zoos will remain around. All we can hope for is that the
captive animals live a decent life and the zoos aid conservation efforts.
No comments:
Post a Comment