WARNING: Somewhat graphic descriptions
During June I had to
attend a field trip in Parasitology conducted by my university. The
whole point of the field trip was to observe parasites, learn their
life cycles and consider how these parasites could potentially affect
the host organism. It was a very interesting field trip but not for
the faint of heart as a lot of dissections were involved. We were no
strangers to dissection. In my second year one of the modules taken
by all students was one that familiarized you with a worm and leech
dissection, a trout dissection and a rat dissection. Then according
to the modules taken you got to do more dissections. Taking Ocean
Biology I dissected dogfish, starfish, sea urchins, shrimps and so
forth. The point isn't what I dissected though, the point is that
some people grew squeamish when they had to deal with mammals while
some saw no point and refused to do dissections. To each their own I
always say but the whole idea intrigued me. Should dissections be
carried on now that we have access to multimedia tools that could
easily emulate a dissection and further more reduce animal welfare.
Here is my opinion on the matter.
There can only be so much
you can learn from a virtual dissection. Things change in animals.
When I first performed my first dissection on a rat(Rattus
norveticus) I was thoroughly
confused. I had looked up manuals and the internal layout of the
animal before hand but I found the lungs to be smaller, the intestine
to take up much more space than I thought and some parts harder or
easier to cut through than I expected. After spending a week
dissecting mice and voles in my Parasitology field trip I got less
messy and more efficient. I can safely say though that if I were to
have a look through the internal structure of the rat online and then
dissect I would definitely be surprised by the differences that are
present. Not to mention things that get you off guard such as
embryos,diseases and most of all the smell.
It
could be something that is needed in your line of work. Usually there
are specialists about who can perform dissections, forensics and they
can determine a cause of death. This is often done to determine if a
population is suffering from a disease or parasite, or if a protected
species is found dead. Whether you want to be one of those
specialists is a different thing all together. However I think that
dissections can be vital as you never know what you may come across
and how dissections could be a solution to a problem affecting
wildlife. If you lack the skill then you may have a harder time
determining what's wrong or identifying key issues. Of course each
animal has a different anatomy so gaining experience on rats doesn't
mean that you can dissect and analyze issues on a deer carcass.
However basic skills such as how deep to cut, what to look out for,
be prepared for smell, don't puncture the gut and so forth are basic
skills that can be applied to any sort of dissection you might come
across.
Of
course there is the dark side. Animals do have to die for you to
learn from dissections. More often than not these animals were to die
as they may be part of a control experiment or bred in captivity
which means they cannot be released in the wild but the fact is that
some institutes actively breed animals for dissection. It's a tough
choice to make. By opting to do a dissection then you passively
condone to animal killing and welfare. Most institutes do it
humanely(or so they claim) and some even use them in sustainable
matters. For example we were told that the rats that were dissected
were gassed and that they were to be given to a local falconry center
after the dissection to feed the birds of prey which I suppose could
offer some closure in knowing that the animal have another use after
their death. Looking into how your university/institute deals with
dissection is a factor that could make you more comfortable with
performing one if you really want to do it but feel bad about the
animal.
No comments:
Post a Comment